Free tool · about 30 seconds

Can AI answer engines actually read your site?

Most sites lose AI visibility for boring, fixable reasons. A CDN quietly blocks the crawlers. The FAQ answers are there but nothing marks them as answers. The homepage takes nine seconds to render for a bot with a render budget of about three. This checks all of that live, right now, on your real site.

What comes back by email

Your citation count, against your competitors

Three real mid-market B2B companies measured on July 31, anonymized because two of them are somebody's live clients. Every figure is an actual count across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Copilot and Grok.

Company	Cited	Closest rival
B2B SaaS, HR technology	4	289
Industrial services	2	11
Leadership analytics platform	0	289

The last one is cited zero times. Not once, on any engine. It is a real company with a real marketing budget, and nobody had told them, because nothing they own measures it.

What this checks

Four things, honestly reported

Every check tells you what it did, or exactly why it could not. Nothing is silently skipped, which is the difference between an audit and a screenshot of a tool.

Core Web Vitals, read from real visitor data where it exists. Where it does not, the result says so and is never allowed to raise a false alarm.
AI crawler access. Your site is fetched twice, once as a browser and once as an answer-engine crawler, and the two responses are compared. This is the most common invisible cause of zero citations and no normal SEO tool tests it.
Structured data. Whether anything on the page tells an engine what you are, and whether your FAQ answers are marked up as answers.
AI citation benchmark. How often the seven major answer engines actually cite you, against named competitors. This one needs a licensed data session, so it is run by hand and sent with the full report.